Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Guest blog by Sarah Tate, from April 2010

As an Author and fellow blogger, I am used to writing about subjects close to my heart. Madeleine is a subject very close to my heart. I have followed her plight from day one, and I still long for her story to reach its conclusion.

I make no apologies for the opinions I have about this case. I believe we are all entitled to share our views and debate openly, without fear of bitter recrimination. I have swayed from one side of the fence to the other, and it was with a heavy heart (and only after having read through most of the Police files), that I settled on my current stance regarding this tragic case.

When I first published this post back in April, it was pointed out to me that the conclusions of Goncalo Amaral's book omit to tell the whole story, that the Police failed to find any REAL evidence of parental involvement in the crime. I am determined to remain open minded in this case, and have therefore checked the book and the files again, just to be sure.

It cannot be disputed that the Police did not find ENOUGH evidence to bring charges, and the case was therefore shelved. It has not been closed, merely shelved. Nobody has been exonerated. Nothing has been proven either way.

Sadly for all involved, there is, as yet, neither solid proof of abduction, nor solid proof of simulation of abduction. Madeleine's fate remains (in the words of Mr Clarence Mitchell) 'a complete mystery'.

And, as far as I am concerned, as long as there is 'mystery', then ALL arguments are still open to debate.

And debate them we most certainly should.

Best wishes
Sarah Tate


An important Anniversary - written on 25th April 2010

I remember the end of April 2007, my marriage was in its death throes. Life was pretty stressful, and it seemed my world was an amalgam of uncertainty and trepidation.

Then, at the beginning of May, something happened which completely took my mind off my own troubles, and made me realise that being a parent is a true blessing, and something we should never take for granted.

A little girl, the same age as my eldest daughter, disappeared whilst on holiday with her parents and siblings in Portugal. That little girl touched my heart, and following her story has, in many ways, changed my view of the world.

We all know her name, everybody on the planet knows Madeleine's name. The media furore which surrounded her disappearance was unprecedented, and will go down in history as the catalyst which sparked massive debate about the media, the power of the internet, and freedom of speech itself.

The intricate ins and outs of this case are widely available to those who wish to dig a little deeper than what's reported in the mainstream press. Following the case has certainly been an eye opener for me, in terms of discovering the shocking reality about how much the public can be manipulated by the press. Thank goodness information can be disseminated globally via Google and internet fora. For anybody who is interested, it doesn't take long to compare and contrast what's reported in the main stream press, to what's actually (and factually) documented in the witness satements contained in the Police Files, which were released to the media when the case was (prematurely) shelved back in 2008. More interesting to discover, is what's not been reported in the mainstream press.

My heart breaks for a little girl who was let down by those closest to her, and then again let down by the prodigious 'machine' which was created in her image. The person who needed help most has been forgotten amidst the PR, litigation and mud slinging from both sides of the fence.

Many books have been written about Madeleine's case, books which look at both sides of the story. But, one of these books 'The Truth of the Lie', written by the former Investigation Coordinator, Goncalo Amaral, has been temporarily banned from sale (pending a trial) following an injunction brought by Madeleine's parents.

Why?

Their argument, is that the conclusions in the book are detrimental to the search for their little girl, because he reproduces the theory that she most probably died in the holiday apartment, and that her death was covered up by her parents.

Now, whether or not these conclusions are correct, is entirely a matter of interpretation. The book details the police investigation as it was experienced by Amaral himself, as well as those in the team of detectives with whom he was working. It doesn't profess to be the gospel. It is a man relaying his own experience of the case, and the conclusions that he and his team arrived at.

Do we not all have the right to document our feelings and experiences as we lived and breathed them?

This is, after all, just one mans summary of the investigation. It's not fabricated or embelished, it sticks closely to the information in the police files. So why has it been banned?

Do we not all have the right to question certain events, and the way in which are presented to us? Are we not allowed to ask questions and demand honest and truthful answers?

How does one book stop people wanting to get to the bottom of what happened to Madeleine? Surely we should consider ALL possibilities, not just the one her parents insist we should believe?

Of course we should!

Today is the Anniversary of the Carnation Revolution in Portugal. It's the anniverary of a day upon which freedom and civil liberties were peacefully restored to an entire nation.

It's a day for celebrating freedom of speech and freedom of expression.

Nobody should be gagged for voicing an opinion. Even if others find their opinions abhorrant, they are still entitled to them.

As for the case itself, I wonder if we'll ever really know what happened. That little girl no longer has a voice, so it's up to others to speak up on her behalf. And it's up to us, the public, to listen to all the arguments, and draw our own informed conclusions.

There are two sides to every argument. I'm glad to be living in a day and age where I have the capacity and the tools which enable me to look behind the media spin, and make up my own mind.

Forca Portugal!

2 comments:

Tezza said...

A very well written article Sarah. It is important that we all remember that this case has only been shelved and that nobody has been exonerated. Nothing has been proven either way. However, this must apply to all THREE people who were made arguidos. Including Robert Murat, who had his arguido status lifed at the same time as Gerry and Kate McCann. He has also not been exonerated in this case either. Neither his innocence or guilt has been proven, however he has the right to remain innocent until proven guilty, the same right which applies to Gerry and Kate McCann.

merlynsam said...

An excellent article Sarah. You capture the dilemma facing all who have followed Madeleine's case since 3rd May 2007 - what to believe and who to believe. Like you, I am firmly in the camp which endorses the right of all individuals to discuss and debate without fear or favour. At least our healthy and respectful discussion serves to keep Madeleine's name on the lips of so many. She must never be forgotten.

Thank you for this article.

merlynsam